.
Feedback

Do You Believe in Heaven?

A Neuroscientist’s visit to ‘Heaven’ after a long battle with bacterial meningitis sounds pretty convincing, but what do you think?

After reading an article and viewing a video on ABC News, I though this topic would be an interesting topic for discussion.

Dr. Eben Alexander, a Harvard neurosurgeon, had a close brush with death about four years ago.

A particularly virulent strain of Escherichia coli (more commonly called E. coli) infected Alexander’s brain with bacterial meningitis.

If you remember from a previous “Practical Science” article, E. coli is usually a very beneficial type of bacteria indeed. It helps us gather nutrients from our food and also aids in the digestive process.

Bacteria, however, have the ability to evolve very rapidly, sometimes resulting in mutations that make them virulent, or highly infective.

In bacterial meningitis, a virulent strain of E. coli enters the central nervous system and ultimately reaches the brain, wreaking havoc.

The brain begins to swell because of inflammation due to our own immune response. This, coupled with lower blood pressure due to the infection, makes it much harder for oxygenated blood to enter the brain.

This results in the death of brain cells and possibly, death of the organism.

Dr. Alexander is a lucky man; he survived the bacterial onslaught after a weeklong coma. Brain scans showed that his entire cerebral cortex, the parts of the brain that are linked with consciousness, thought, memory, and understanding, were not functioning at all.

Nurses at Alexander’s bedside stated that when pulling his eyelids back to shine light to elicit some response, his eyes were just off and cocked to one side.

There was nobody home.

The doctors working on Alexander said he would most likely not survive, and if he did, he would have brain damage for the rest of his life.

What is interesting about his experience is that he claims he had an amazing journey to “Heaven”.

Alexander states that his journey started in some kind of underworld where there were root-like objects. He stated that this place was dark and murky.

He also remembers that he had no consciousness of his body or his mortal life but felt only his own awareness.

Alexander stated that he was in this underworld for what felt likes years.

Next, a white light rescued Alexander from the darkness.

He states that this light was beautiful and had a melody. Upon entering the light, he saw a valley full with flowers and unexplainable complexity.

Alexander was accompanied by a young woman who flew with him on his journey on a butterfly wing. She had a message for him to take back.

This message was not spoken in word, but in thought.

According to Alexander, she said, “You are loved; you are cherished; there's nothing you have to fear; there's nothing you can do wrong."

Alexander said that God was there and appeared to him as an orb of brilliant light. He understood that it was a vast presence of love – all of eternity and all of conscious existence.

After his recovery, Alexander, who was adopted, was shown a picture of this biological family.

After staring at the picture, Alexander saw his guardian angel – his sister who he had never seen before and who had died a few years prior.

Many believe that Alexander just experienced a hallucination. His mind was under the influence of a devastating disease after all.

Alexander states that he knows that the events happened and that they happened outside of his body.

Alexander, unlike most other people that claim to have had near-death experiences, had a weapon on his side – years of neurological and scientific experience.

Alexander states that in this infection, his brain was drained of energy to a point where he couldn’t have remembered anything.

He states that his cortex was totally inactive and incapable of producing dreams, thought, or anything of the sort.

Alexander isn’t affected by the thoughts of his skeptics because he states that he himself was one as well.

Dr. Alexander wrote a book about his experiences entitled “Proof of Heaven.”

Is this enough ‘proof?’

First, I would like to state that I, as previously mentioned in a previous article of “Practical Science,” believe that there is more unknown than there is known.

That being said, I believe that an afterlife, a higher form of consciousness, and God, are all possibilities in this truly amazing thing we call the universe.

I have friends, family, and acquaintances that are on both sides of the coin - Some are believers and some are non-believers. I respect both viewpoints equally.

I would like to believe Dr. Alexander’s claim and, in fact, I do.

Sure, It’s always possible that he is making all of this up to sell a book, but I really feel he is sincere.

There is one thing however, that I cannot get out of my head.

The brain itself is the ‘final medical frontier’. It is really a mystery to us at this point in the game.

I understand that Dr. Alexander’s cortex was totally inactive during his experience, but there is still so much we do not understand about the brain itself.

Could it be possible that the infection made his brain go haywire?

I think its possible.

It seems clear, barring a very selfish desire to make money by exploiting people’s faith and hope, that the events described by Alexander did indeed happen. However, where it happened remains to be understood.

Honestly, we will probably never know, but I think it is important to wonder about and discuss this truly spectacular experience.

Tell me what you think about this in the Comments.

Was it a brain malfunction or an actual trip into the afterlife?

Think about it.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lower Providence Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jack Minster November 3, 2012 at 11:02 pm
Philip - true that university experience may differ among students. A scientific study, How Corrosive Is College to Religious Faith and Practice?
By Mark D. Regnerus; Jeremy E. Uecker 62 percent of kids who go to college with religious beliefs leave without them. Obviously not all universities and not all kids, but facts do exist to support what I myself experience in speaking with many college students, current and recent graduates, who went in faithful and conservative, and emerged faithless and liberal. There is no sense debating it in this thread if the students you know and you yourself are experiencing something different, however the trend was proven, and I see it hitting close to home. The pressure to abandon the scientifically unprovable "myths" of Judeo-Christian teachings are not necessarily coming from teachers (though I know for a fact some teachers outright teach the students "if science cannot prove it, don't waste yourself clinging to it." This I know from speaking with Ivy League students myself, teachers in Biology, teachers in other sciences. Your experience may be different, but that changes nothing.
Philip Freda November 3, 2012 at 11:13 pm
College education teaches us to think critically, and if that means that some people lose their religious beliefs then so be it. I myself entered college as a "catholic" and left being more spiritual and more understanding of everyone's beliefs, Judeo-Christian or not. This, however, didn't result from college directly, but from a culmination of many aspects in my life that changed. There is a huge difference between religion and spirituality and the world and the people in it will undoubtedly evolve to a more utilitarian set of morals and beliefs - it is unstoppable. God is greater than any set or rules and regulations outlined by one religion. As far as your conservative/liberal argument, all I can say is that religion should not coincide with political views. I am truly sorry that you have come in contact with students who have lost faith and teachers who teach that faith is folly. Just remember, there is nothing wrong with questioning everything, even religious beliefs.
Jack Minster November 3, 2012 at 11:45 pm
Philip, I couldn't agree more. Question everything. Read everything. I graduated from Villanova, a Catholic university, with world religion requirements. I believe it essential to understand people's motivations by exploring their core religious teachings. I've read the Koran, the Book of Mormon, the Buddhist teachings of Siddartha Gautema, its founder. Hindu and Sikh. To me it's fascinating. After reading the 4 Gospels and Letters of Paul, I believe THE God did visit 2000 years ago, and that these documents are eyewitness accounts of supernatural events, as legitimate as accounts of Columbus sailing to the Americas. Thus I take issue with respected teachers who advise malleable young minds not even to include it as worthwhile reading, to write it off as unsubstantiated myth on par with Aesop's Fables, that the only questions worth asking will eventually be answered by science, therefore put all faith and energy into science. Grrrrr.
Philip Freda November 4, 2012 at 12:31 am
Believe it or not, I believe that all religious views are equally correct. However, I believe that they are equally flawed. It's all the same thing to me - just different flavors of ice cream. I do not argue God. I will say this though: People that lose their faith, gain faith, die, everything and anything, happens for a reason for a plan that we will never comprehend. To quote a favorite meme of mine: "Don't take things to seriously. We are a bunch of talking monkeys travelling on an organic spaceship across the galaxy." Sit back and and enjoy the ride Jack. People change and adapt and so do believes. God is everywhere, in every person, equally and forever. Let us just be tolerant of others. People, like the scientists and students you are talking about, are going through the motions called life. At the end of the day, we are all still loved and accepted equally by God.
Jack Minster November 4, 2012 at 12:34 am
Stay loving, Philip.
Joe The Nerd Ferraro November 4, 2012 at 04:13 pm
wrote this a few years ago - you might like.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-the-nerd-ferraro/bishops-of-atheism_b_331551.html
Joe The Nerd Ferraro November 4, 2012 at 04:16 pm
ty Jack - I appreciate it.
You might want to look at the article i just gave to Philip. My positions came from that liberal of liberal institutions - TEMPLE !!! I have a few articles on the arrogance of the overly-educated. Somehow people who get an advanced degree in one thing think they are expert in all things...
Joe The Nerd Ferraro November 4, 2012 at 04:17 pm
mmmm - crunchy
Joe The Nerd Ferraro November 4, 2012 at 04:19 pm
you guys might want to look at some Mark Twain -
Captain Stormfield's Visit to Heaven...
Jack Minster November 4, 2012 at 04:25 pm
And Lee Stroebel's "The Case For Christ" (also Case For Faith, Case For Creator)
Morgan King November 4, 2012 at 05:52 pm
Of course higher education's emphasis on critical thinking leads towards less faith - faith, by its very definition, is noncritical. Religion has always been about teaching a society's morals and laws through an appeal to an unchangeable authority that came before you. Literal interpretation of religious phenomenon, though, is a foolish endeavor - ancient texts relied on the impossible to convey unknowable power (a flaming bush that doesn't burn away! Water transmuted into wine!) and are, pretty clearly, intended as hyperbole. Faith insists you reject reason by presenting the unreasonable as its evidence.
Philip Freda November 5, 2012 at 01:07 am
Interesting read Joe. Thank you!
Jack Minster November 5, 2012 at 01:49 pm
Just like 100% of your other blog posts, Morgan, this one is no exception. Attacking the messenger not the message. Spinning fact into "hypotheticals", etc. You ARE the Obama electorate.
http://biology.brown.edu/bug/neuro The above professors at Brown are but one example of real, not hypothetical individuals who teach "if the scientific method cannot provide a shred of credence for a theory, abandon the myth and move on to another that may be more scientifically provable." Directly selling the atheist foundation to impressionable young minds. Also Morgan I cited an actual scientific study, How Corrosive Is College to Religious Faith and Practice? conducted by Mark D. Regnerus who proved that 62 percent of kids who go to college with religious beliefs leave without them. Your polite and intelligent response is to call me a "strawman" and provide a link to the wiki definition of a strawman. Jokester. Your President informs us you'll be voting for REVENGE tomorrow. Fits you perfectly.
Philip Freda November 5, 2012 at 03:20 pm
Jack, I understand how disheartening it can be to see people stray away from religious beliefs that you hold so dear but just remember something, no mind is more impressionable than a child's. A person of faith should have unshakable resolve. Perhaps, it is God's plan that these people have questioned their beliefs.
Jack Minster November 5, 2012 at 03:35 pm
Philip, I was correcting a rude erroneous post made by Morgan-stalker, and reiterating an earlier point. As to your comment, I do not suffer from "disheartening." I do observe that science/atheism is absolutely unquestioned in schools, where as Intelligent Design or any other historic or logic-based attempt to suggest the existence of or influence by deity on the natural world, is iniquitous.
If you Philip were to believe your own posts, you would support a full and complete course training starting in the middle or secondary education levels of all world religions, dives as deep as world history, European history, American history, etc. After all, how can anyone possibly understand why a healthy young man would strap on explosives and detonate himself in an Israel shopping mall killing dozens of innocent children, and that his family will now receive direct martyr benefits from his government, without taking a deep dive into Islam, as an example.
Philip Freda November 5, 2012 at 04:48 pm
Again Jack, science and atheism are not the same thing. Science is the use of observation to better understand the natural world. That's it and that's all. Intelligent design cannot be tested and therefore does not belong in a science class. It's as simple as that. It has nothing to do with religion. Creationism frankly doesn't have a leg to stand on. You wouldn't discuss Shakespeare in a mathematics course. Again, it is very possible to embrace both science and religion. Unfortunately, on both sides, people like differently. They have nothing to do with one another.
I received world religion courses in both a Catholic high school and in college and they are part of the curriculum. So, I do support it very much. You just have to remain in the scope of the class. Again, Science is about hypothesizing, observing, and testing. If it can't be tested, it is outside the scope of science and therefore, none of our business. I suggest reading a previous article that tackles faith and evolution: http://uppermoreland.patch.com/articles/the-theory-of-evolution-made-simple
Jack Minster November 5, 2012 at 05:59 pm
In The Grand Design, Professor Stephen Hawking argues that the Big Bang, rather than occurring following the intervention of a divine being, was inevitable due to the law of gravity. "There is no God... there is no heaven, it's a fairy story," he argues, using science to disprove the existence of God. He gets a voice in schools.
A historian arguing that secular sources also support the supernatural events associated with the ministry of Jesus Christ, such as court writings of the time describing him as a sorcerer, etc, would be banned from study faster than you can say "Separation of Church and State." There is an arrogance there. Historical science has less value than astrophysics.
Sharpie November 5, 2012 at 07:14 pm
Heaven is not a place. It is a mind-set driven by our behavior. You can be alive and living hell or heaven. Hell and heaven are right here. We are creating them, individually and collectively.
Jack Minster November 5, 2012 at 07:35 pm
Just noticed this, laughing. Joe. Delightfully twisted thou art. :-)
Philip Freda November 5, 2012 at 10:18 pm
I actually covered this very topic after Discovery Channel premiere of the show curiosity:
uppermoreland.patch.com/articles/is-there-no-more-room-for-god I agree that Professor Hawking makes an interesting argument, but just like Intelligent Design, it cannot be testing as it something to discuss rather than experiment And Jack, let's be honest, there isn't enough empirical evidence to either refute or bolster in the miracles of the Bible, that's were faith comes in Unless you know someone who can walk on water, it looks like we can't test this out either
Morgan King November 5, 2012 at 11:46 pm
Jack, how is it fact, and not hypothetical, that scientists - all of them, by your blanket statement, and none of them, by any proof proffered - argue 'if the scientific method cannot prove a thing, it is false until so proven'?
I'm not calling you a strawman - the scientist in your argument is the strawman. Maybe you don't understand how this works? Also, I've not disputed that people leaving higher education are less religious - as I posted here, that is a pretty obvious outcome of critical thinking.Faith, by definition, is noncritical. I don't see anything resembling your quote on the Brown Neuroscience faculty page - who said that, and in what context?
Philip Freda November 6, 2012 at 01:28 am
I couldn't have said it better myself, thanks Sharpie
Jack Minster November 6, 2012 at 02:19 am
Two words: Last Judgment.
Philip Freda November 6, 2012 at 02:36 am
?
Jack Minster November 6, 2012 at 04:28 am
If I need to explain Judgment Day, you've not read any Gospels. These Gospels would completely contradict Sharpie's theory with which you vehemently agreed. That Heaven (and Hell) are not real, that they are what we make of them. The Gospels state that these are real, with a great chasm fixed between them.
Morgan King November 6, 2012 at 04:42 am
One Word: Delusional
Philip Freda November 6, 2012 at 04:46 am
No please save me from that superstitious, fear-mongering hokum. I've heard it unfortunately more than once. It's a little too anthropomorphic and petty for God as I understand Him/She/It. Sorry, wasn't sure what you were referencing. Sharpie was making an interesting and insightful comment.
Jack Minster November 6, 2012 at 04:52 am
Morgan-stalker! One word: Derp. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGn1Ap14Nd8
Matt November 6, 2012 at 06:14 am
Hello all, Jack, Phil, Joe, Anne, Morgan, and any other posters "sorry if i forget to add you", I would simply like to add that i believe that this post is simply a matter of personal belief and opinion, I myself have grown up catholic all my life and completely, understand your frustration jack. Although I myself have gone threw a great deal in my life, not to say that any of you have not, but there is are usually petty arguments that lead people to become frustrated because of one persons belief against another. The "Godly" thing to do would be to accept ones opinion as there own and not prosecute them for that, I hope that your church has tough you that jack, it surely has to me. I grew up, and away from the Catholic religion but hold the morals it taught me close to my heart. I myself can only say "I DO NOT KNOW", to those questions that almost all humans ask regarding life after death. I see my self as a young man on a quest to understand people, and to not judge them for their beliefs, if you cannot do so, then i urge you to be as courteous as possible to each of our beliefs. One of us may be right; on the on other hand we could all be wrong, But that is what makes this topic so exciting. Just the fact that we are alive and able to ask these questions is a precious gift, this should not be overlooked. I ask us all to respect ones opinions, and not try to hurt some one over such a subject. And jack, Jesus - would he judge some one based on their personal belief?
Matt November 6, 2012 at 06:56 am
I'm Sure you would say yes! that there is only 1 way to heaven, and that is through the teachings of Christ, but if you are an expert on the bible, then you would see many of the Saints, were sinners and had doubts in Jesus. Do they hold a place in hell? Are you saying that if one does not follow the "Churches" teachings their bound for an eternity in hell. This is where you are mistaken "Jack" not matter what faith you are Buddhist, Christian, Muslin, Hindu, as long as you have lived you're life, with good morals and judgement, there is no way that some one with the enlightenment of Jesus Christ would condemn you to hell. I have studied all of the major religions, and guess what i found out. They are all just teachings of good morality and teach to treat one another with respect. You "Jack" seem to be the only sinner on this blog judging people for what they believe. You of all people should know only one "Person" can do that. So i call you out as the sinner here, and I hope you realize that you're close mindedness will only lead to more turmoil for yourself. You never know you may find yourself burning in the depths of hell one day if that is what you believe. I hold no grudge against you, I am only ashamed at you're behavior towards you're fellow neighbors. Take you're time to realize that Christianity is not a tool you can use to judge others, but is a guideline to live you're life by. Jesus himself saved a prostitute from dying. You need to re-evaluate you're grounds.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Joe The Nerd Ferraro June 18, 2013 at 12:06 pm
doesn't get any better than Zwahlen's
Kate McShane June 18, 2013 at 06:58 pm
how generous, Zwahlen's adds so much to our community!
Lindsey Krick-Fox June 19, 2013 at 11:16 am
Everything is delicious here. So happy to have you in our community!
Catherine Beyer April 12, 2013 at 02:14 am
well actually Dave , there are 2 homes that are literrally in the direct path of the center line ofRead More the sewer- I'm afraid if the sewer is permitted to go thru they would have to condemn them - the blasting would be so close- I don't think the houses could sustain it- they are built on pillars because their so close to the water- they are beautiful waterfront homes! full of children who go swimming and just love their homes and the creek.. the sewer would go right thru their well water lines and septic systems.. when there is another alternative right across the creek!
Catherine Beyer April 12, 2013 at 02:17 am
yes and don't foget we will be left with manholes where 100 yrs old trees use to be- a big 70ft wideRead More swath-like a bowling alley, losing all our privacy and shade we will never see the regrowth in our life time.:(
Catherine Beyer April 12, 2013 at 02:22 am
they don't care about us or their civic duty- I'm sorry but they made themselves very clear tonightRead More when after 3 yrs of pleading with them and even after DEP caught them in their deceptions with the 537 plan- they still chose to condemn us-- if they could just see the real people whose lives they are ruining forever but i forgot they don't care... well thank you Lower Providence for standing by us and thank you Trappe for standing with us.. Trappe was the only other township who cared!