After reading an article and viewing a video on ABC News, I though this topic would be an interesting topic for discussion.
Dr. Eben Alexander, a Harvard neurosurgeon, had a close brush with death about four years ago.
A particularly virulent strain of Escherichia coli (more commonly called E. coli) infected Alexander’s brain with bacterial meningitis.
If you remember from a previous “Practical Science” article, E. coli is usually a very beneficial type of bacteria indeed. It helps us gather nutrients from our food and also aids in the digestive process.
Bacteria, however, have the ability to evolve very rapidly, sometimes resulting in mutations that make them virulent, or highly infective.
In bacterial meningitis, a virulent strain of E. coli enters the central nervous system and ultimately reaches the brain, wreaking havoc.
The brain begins to swell because of inflammation due to our own immune response. This, coupled with lower blood pressure due to the infection, makes it much harder for oxygenated blood to enter the brain.
This results in the death of brain cells and possibly, death of the organism.
Dr. Alexander is a lucky man; he survived the bacterial onslaught after a weeklong coma. Brain scans showed that his entire cerebral cortex, the parts of the brain that are linked with consciousness, thought, memory, and understanding, were not functioning at all.
Nurses at Alexander’s bedside stated that when pulling his eyelids back to shine light to elicit some response, his eyes were just off and cocked to one side.
There was nobody home.
The doctors working on Alexander said he would most likely not survive, and if he did, he would have brain damage for the rest of his life.
What is interesting about his experience is that he claims he had an amazing journey to “Heaven”.
Alexander states that his journey started in some kind of underworld where there were root-like objects. He stated that this place was dark and murky.
He also remembers that he had no consciousness of his body or his mortal life but felt only his own awareness.
Alexander stated that he was in this underworld for what felt likes years.
Next, a white light rescued Alexander from the darkness.
He states that this light was beautiful and had a melody. Upon entering the light, he saw a valley full with flowers and unexplainable complexity.
Alexander was accompanied by a young woman who flew with him on his journey on a butterfly wing. She had a message for him to take back.
This message was not spoken in word, but in thought.
According to Alexander, she said, “You are loved; you are cherished; there's nothing you have to fear; there's nothing you can do wrong."
Alexander said that God was there and appeared to him as an orb of brilliant light. He understood that it was a vast presence of love – all of eternity and all of conscious existence.
After his recovery, Alexander, who was adopted, was shown a picture of this biological family.
After staring at the picture, Alexander saw his guardian angel – his sister who he had never seen before and who had died a few years prior.
Many believe that Alexander just experienced a hallucination. His mind was under the influence of a devastating disease after all.
Alexander states that he knows that the events happened and that they happened outside of his body.
Alexander, unlike most other people that claim to have had near-death experiences, had a weapon on his side – years of neurological and scientific experience.
Alexander states that in this infection, his brain was drained of energy to a point where he couldn’t have remembered anything.
He states that his cortex was totally inactive and incapable of producing dreams, thought, or anything of the sort.
Alexander isn’t affected by the thoughts of his skeptics because he states that he himself was one as well.
Dr. Alexander wrote a book about his experiences entitled “Proof of Heaven.”
Is this enough ‘proof?’
First, I would like to state that I, as previously mentioned in a previous article of “Practical Science,” believe that there is more unknown than there is known.
That being said, I believe that an afterlife, a higher form of consciousness, and God, are all possibilities in this truly amazing thing we call the universe.
I have friends, family, and acquaintances that are on both sides of the coin - Some are believers and some are non-believers. I respect both viewpoints equally.
I would like to believe Dr. Alexander’s claim and, in fact, I do.
Sure, It’s always possible that he is making all of this up to sell a book, but I really feel he is sincere.
There is one thing however, that I cannot get out of my head.
The brain itself is the ‘final medical frontier’. It is really a mystery to us at this point in the game.
I understand that Dr. Alexander’s cortex was totally inactive during his experience, but there is still so much we do not understand about the brain itself.
Could it be possible that the infection made his brain go haywire?
I think its possible.
It seems clear, barring a very selfish desire to make money by exploiting people’s faith and hope, that the events described by Alexander did indeed happen. However, where it happened remains to be understood.
Honestly, we will probably never know, but I think it is important to wonder about and discuss this truly spectacular experience.
Tell me what you think about this in the Comments.
Was it a brain malfunction or an actual trip into the afterlife?
Think about it.
By Mark D. Regnerus; Jeremy E. Uecker 62 percent of kids who go to college with religious beliefs leave without them. Obviously not all universities and not all kids, but facts do exist to support what I myself experience in speaking with many college students, current and recent graduates, who went in faithful and conservative, and emerged faithless and liberal. There is no sense debating it in this thread if the students you know and you yourself are experiencing something different, however the trend was proven, and I see it hitting close to home. The pressure to abandon the scientifically unprovable "myths" of Judeo-Christian teachings are not necessarily coming from teachers (though I know for a fact some teachers outright teach the students "if science cannot prove it, don't waste yourself clinging to it." This I know from speaking with Ivy League students myself, teachers in Biology, teachers in other sciences. Your experience may be different, but that changes nothing.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-the-nerd-ferraro/bishops-of-atheism_b_331551.html
You might want to look at the article i just gave to Philip. My positions came from that liberal of liberal institutions - TEMPLE !!! I have a few articles on the arrogance of the overly-educated. Somehow people who get an advanced degree in one thing think they are expert in all things...
Captain Stormfield's Visit to Heaven...
http://biology.brown.edu/bug/neuro The above professors at Brown are but one example of real, not hypothetical individuals who teach "if the scientific method cannot provide a shred of credence for a theory, abandon the myth and move on to another that may be more scientifically provable." Directly selling the atheist foundation to impressionable young minds. Also Morgan I cited an actual scientific study, How Corrosive Is College to Religious Faith and Practice? conducted by Mark D. Regnerus who proved that 62 percent of kids who go to college with religious beliefs leave without them. Your polite and intelligent response is to call me a "strawman" and provide a link to the wiki definition of a strawman. Jokester. Your President informs us you'll be voting for REVENGE tomorrow. Fits you perfectly.
If you Philip were to believe your own posts, you would support a full and complete course training starting in the middle or secondary education levels of all world religions, dives as deep as world history, European history, American history, etc. After all, how can anyone possibly understand why a healthy young man would strap on explosives and detonate himself in an Israel shopping mall killing dozens of innocent children, and that his family will now receive direct martyr benefits from his government, without taking a deep dive into Islam, as an example.
I received world religion courses in both a Catholic high school and in college and they are part of the curriculum. So, I do support it very much. You just have to remain in the scope of the class. Again, Science is about hypothesizing, observing, and testing. If it can't be tested, it is outside the scope of science and therefore, none of our business. I suggest reading a previous article that tackles faith and evolution: http://uppermoreland.patch.com/articles/the-theory-of-evolution-made-simple
A historian arguing that secular sources also support the supernatural events associated with the ministry of Jesus Christ, such as court writings of the time describing him as a sorcerer, etc, would be banned from study faster than you can say "Separation of Church and State." There is an arrogance there. Historical science has less value than astrophysics.
uppermoreland.patch.com/articles/is-there-no-more-room-for-god I agree that Professor Hawking makes an interesting argument, but just like Intelligent Design, it cannot be testing as it something to discuss rather than experiment And Jack, let's be honest, there isn't enough empirical evidence to either refute or bolster in the miracles of the Bible, that's were faith comes in Unless you know someone who can walk on water, it looks like we can't test this out either
I'm not calling you a strawman - the scientist in your argument is the strawman. Maybe you don't understand how this works? Also, I've not disputed that people leaving higher education are less religious - as I posted here, that is a pretty obvious outcome of critical thinking.Faith, by definition, is noncritical. I don't see anything resembling your quote on the Brown Neuroscience faculty page - who said that, and in what context?